Claude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

DeepSeek
$0.11 / $4.44
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 13.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 23.1). DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.11
Output price / 1M$40.00$4.44
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$1.19
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.097
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index64.623.1
Coding index—68.8
Providers524
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-08-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 13.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ≈ $2,442.

More comparisons