DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.0434 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
K

Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro

Kt
$0.20 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
K
Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 3.3× cheaper than Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro
Input price / 1M$0.0434$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.35
Cached input / 1M$0.035$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output944K236K
Intelligence index——
Coding index69.1—
Providers27—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-07-312026-11-05
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 3.3× cheaper than Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens. Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro: 261,795 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $236.80, Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons