DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.0434 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Tiny

inclusionAI
$0.015 / $0.045
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 4.8× cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Ling 3.0 Tiny
Input price / 1M$0.0434$0.015
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.045
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.0225
Cached input / 1M$0.035$0.003
Context window1M262K
Max output944K250K
Intelligence index——
Coding index69.126.5
Providers27—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-312026-08-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Ling 3.0 Tiny?

Ling 3.0 Tiny is 4.8× cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $236.80, Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50.

More comparisons