DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

DeepSeek
$0.27 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.0× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 14.8). Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLing 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.27$0.06
Output price / 1M$1.00$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.14$0.012
Context window164K262K
Max output33K33K
Intelligence index14.824.6
Coding index43.557
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-09-222026-09-10
Retirement2026-09-28

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.0× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ≈ $1,040, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons