DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

DeepSeek

$0.27 / $1.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Xiaomi

$4.35 / $8.70

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 12.0× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).

	DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus	MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Input price / 1M	$0.27	$4.35
Output price / 1M	$1.00	$8.70
Blended price (3:1)	$0.45	$5.44
Cached input / 1M	$0.14	$0.036
Context window	164K	1M
Max output	33K	131K
Intelligence index	14.8	—
Coding index	43.5	—
Providers	—	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2025-09-22	2026-09-21
Retirement	2026-09-28	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 12.0× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ≈ $1,040, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050.

More comparisons