DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

DeepSeek
$0.27 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Xiaomi
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.6× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 164K).
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$0.27$0.14
Output price / 1M$1.00$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$0.18
Cached input / 1M—$0.0028
Context window164K1.1M
Max output147K131K
Intelligence index—26.7
Coding index43.5—
Providers—8
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-09-222026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.6× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ≈ $1,040, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons