Command A vs Seed-2.0-Code
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Seed-2.0-Code is 3.9× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Seed-2.0-Code has the larger context window (262K vs 256K).
| Command A | Seed-2.0-Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $1.13 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | — |
| Coding index | 27.8 | — |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-11-11 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Seed-2.0-Code?
Seed-2.0-Code is 3.9× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Seed-2.0-Code: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Seed-2.0-Code: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Seed-2.0-Code ≈ $2,500.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProSeed-2.0-Code vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSeed-2.0-Code vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSeed-2.0-Code vs Command A+Seed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 Luna ProSeed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 LunaSeed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 Sol ProSeed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 SolSeed-2.0-Code vs Claude Opus 5.5