Command A vs Seed 2.1 Turbo
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Seed 2.1 Turbo is 4.4× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Seed 2.1 Turbo has the larger context window (262K vs 256K).
| Command A | Seed 2.1 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $2.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $1.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | — |
| Coding index | 27.8 | — |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo is 4.4× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Seed 2.1 Turbo: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Seed 2.1 Turbo: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Seed 2.1 Turbo ≈ $2,250.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSeed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSeed 2.1 Turbo vs Command A+Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 Luna ProSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 LunaSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 Sol ProSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 SolSeed 2.1 Turbo vs Claude Opus 5.5