Command A vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 31% cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (45.4 vs 13.1). Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Command A | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.25 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 45.4 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 76.2 |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-09-03 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 31% cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 5.5