Command A vs Ministral 3 3B 2512
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 43.8× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.1 vs 4.8). Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 131K).
| Command A | Ministral 3 3B 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.10 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.10 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.01 |
| Context window | 256K | 131K |
| Max output | 8K | 105K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 4.8 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 4.8 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2025-12-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Ministral 3 3B 2512?
Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 43.8× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Ministral 3 3B 2512: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Ministral 3 3B 2512: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Ministral 3 3B 2512 ≈ $250.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs Command A+Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs GPT-6 LunaMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs GPT-6 SolMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs Claude Opus 5.5