Command A vs MiniMax M2.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiniMax M2.7 is 8.3× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.8 vs 13.1). Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 205K).
| Command A | MiniMax M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $1.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.52 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.06 |
| Context window | 256K | 205K |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 22.8 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 52.6 |
| Providers | 1 | 9 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-03-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or MiniMax M2.7?
MiniMax M2.7 is 8.3× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs MiniMax M2.7: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. MiniMax M2.7: 204,800 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, MiniMax M2.7 ≈ $1,200.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiniMax M2.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiniMax M2.7 vs Command A+MiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-6 LunaMiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-6 SolMiniMax M2.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5