Command A vs gpt-oss-20b
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: gpt-oss-20b is 121.5× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.1 vs 9). Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 131K).
| Command A | gpt-oss-20b | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.018 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.09 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.036 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 131K |
| Max output | 8K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 9 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 20.7 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2025-08-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or gpt-oss-20b?
gpt-oss-20b is 121.5× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs gpt-oss-20b: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. gpt-oss-20b: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, gpt-oss-20b ≈ $81.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra Progpt-oss-20b vs GLM 5.3 Primegpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8 Max Primegpt-oss-20b vs Command A+gpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Luna Progpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Lunagpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Sol Progpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Solgpt-oss-20b vs Claude Opus 5.5