Command A vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GPT-5.6 Luna is 9.7× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (37.3 vs 13.1). GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M vs 256K).
| Command A | GPT-5.6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $1.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.45 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.02 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 8K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 37.3 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 71.4 |
| Providers | 1 | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-07-09 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is 9.7× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs GPT-5.6 Luna: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, GPT-5.6 Luna ≈ $1,000.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-5.6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5.6 Luna vs Command A+GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5