Command A vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Gemini 3.6 Flash is 2.9× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (34 vs 13.1). Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Command A | Gemini 3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.75 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $3.75 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $1.50 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.075 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 66K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 34 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 69.2 |
| Providers | 1 | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-07-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is 2.9× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Gemini 3.6 Flash ≈ $3,375.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemini 3.6 Flash vs Command A+Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5