Command A vs Nano Banana 2.1
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nano Banana 2.1 is 31% cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 66K).
| Command A | Nano Banana 2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $1.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $7.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 66K |
| Max output | 8K | 59K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-10-06 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Nano Banana 2.1?
Nano Banana 2.1 is 31% cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Nano Banana 2.1: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750.
More comparisons
Command A vs Gemini 4 CarbonCommand A vs Claude Fable 5.2Command A vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashCommand A vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashCommand A vs Hy4Command A vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalCommand A vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A vs Mistral Large 4Command A vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Fable 5.2Nano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs Hy4Nano Banana 2.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro