Command A+ vs LFM2.5-2.6B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: LFM2.5-2.6B is 35% cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A+ has the larger context window (192K vs 128K).
| Command A+ | LFM2.5-2.6B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.35 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.60 | $0.39 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | $0.04 |
| Context window | 192K | 128K |
| Max output | 64K | 8K |
| Intelligence index | 6.2 | — |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 7.7 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-08-11 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or LFM2.5-2.6B?
LFM2.5-2.6B is 35% cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A+ vs LFM2.5-2.6B: which has a bigger context window?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. LFM2.5-2.6B: 128,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, LFM2.5-2.6B ≈ $950.00.
More comparisons
Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A+ vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A+ vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A+ vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A+ vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A+ vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A+ vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A+ vs Nano Banana 2.1Command A+ vs Mistral Large 4Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6.1 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProLFM2.5-2.6B vs GPT-6.1 TerraLFM2.5-2.6B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLFM2.5-2.6B vs Kimi K3.1 ProLFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLFM2.5-2.6B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 4 ArgonLFM2.5-2.6B vs Claude Haiku 5.5