LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Liquid

LFM2.5-2.6B

Liquid
$0.35 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Liquid
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 39% cheaper than LFM2.5-2.6B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
LFM2.5-2.6BNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.35$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.39$0.24
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.02
Context window128K1M
Max output8K236K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index7.7—
Providers—9
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-112026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, LFM2.5-2.6B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 39% cheaper than LFM2.5-2.6B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

LFM2.5-2.6B: 128,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: LFM2.5-2.6B ≈ $950.00, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons