Codestral 2508 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Codestral 2508

Mistral AI
$0.30 / $0.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 4.1× cheaper than Codestral 2508 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 256K).
Codestral 2508Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.90$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.04
Context window256K262K
Max output205K131K
Intelligence index12.9
Coding index26.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-08-012026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 4.1× cheaper than Codestral 2508 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Codestral 2508 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons