Codestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.6× cheaper than Codestral 2508 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Codestral 2508 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.90 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.45 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 205K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-01 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.6× cheaper than Codestral 2508 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Codestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Codestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCodestral 2508 vs Command A+Codestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Luna ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 LunaCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Sol ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 SolCodestral 2508 vs Claude Opus 5.5Codestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCodestral 2508 vs Grok 4.7Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCodestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCodestral 2508 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 AstraCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Astra ProCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5