Codestral 2508 vs Command A+
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Codestral 2508 is 25% cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Codestral 2508 has the larger context window (256K vs 192K).
| Codestral 2508 | Command A+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.90 | $1.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.45 | $0.60 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 256K | 192K |
| Max output | 205K | 64K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-01 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or Command A+?
Codestral 2508 is 25% cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Codestral 2508 vs Command A+: which has a bigger context window?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Command A+: 192,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050, Command A+ ≈ $1,350.
More comparisons
Codestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Luna ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 LunaCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Sol ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 SolCodestral 2508 vs Claude Opus 5.5Codestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCodestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCodestral 2508 vs Grok 4.7Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCodestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCodestral 2508 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 AstraCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Astra ProCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed