Codestral 2508 vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Codestral 2508 is 5.3× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 256K).
| Codestral 2508 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.90 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.45 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 256K | 500K |
| Max output | 205K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.4 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-01 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or Grok 4.7?
Codestral 2508 is 5.3× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Codestral 2508 vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
Codestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCodestral 2508 vs Command A+Codestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Luna ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 LunaCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Sol ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 SolCodestral 2508 vs Claude Opus 5.5Codestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCodestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCodestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCodestral 2508 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 AstraCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Astra ProCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5