Codestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Codestral 2508 is 24% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Codestral 2508 | GLM 5.3 FlashX | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.37 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.90 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.45 | $0.59 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.09 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 205K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-01 | 2026-09-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or GLM 5.3 FlashX?
Codestral 2508 is 24% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Codestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.
More comparisons
Codestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCodestral 2508 vs Command A+Codestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Luna ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 LunaCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Sol ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 SolCodestral 2508 vs Claude Opus 5.5Codestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCodestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCodestral 2508 vs Grok 4.7Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCodestral 2508 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 AstraCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Astra ProCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5