Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic
$3.00 / $15.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 66.7× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (30.1 vs 24.6). Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Sonnet 4.6Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$3.00$0.06
Output price / 1M$15.00$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$6.00$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.30$0.012
Context window1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index30.124.6
Coding index6357
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-02-172026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 66.7× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 1,000,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 4.6 ≈ $13,500, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons