Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic
$3.00 / $15.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Z
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 10.2× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Sonnet 4.6GLM 5.3 FlashX
Input price / 1M$3.00$0.37
Output price / 1M$15.00$1.25
Blended price (3:1)$6.00$0.59
Cached input / 1M$0.30$0.09
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index30.1
Coding index63
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-02-172026-09-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM 5.3 FlashX?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 10.2× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 4.6 ≈ $13,500, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.

More comparisons