Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic
$3.00 / $15.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
D

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.14 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
D
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 28.6× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.5 vs 30.1). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$3.00$0.14
Output price / 1M$15.00$0.42
Blended price (3:1)$6.00$0.21
Cached input / 1M$0.30$0.0042
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index30.139.5
Coding index63
Providers26
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-02-172026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 28.6× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 4.6 ≈ $13,500, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00.

More comparisons