Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.45 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 6.1× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.45
Output price / 1M$0.50$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$1.21
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M128K
Max output128K16K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index—22.1
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072025-07-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 6.1× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons