Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Moonshot AI

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Moonshot AI
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Arcee Ai

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Moonshot AI
Arcee Ai
Verdict: Trinity Large Thinking is 10.3× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.5 vs 10.8). Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Kimi K3.1 ProTrinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.25
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.06
Context window1M262K
Max output944K80K
Intelligence index46.510.8
Coding index—25.8
Providers23—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-232026-04-01
Retirement—2026-10-26

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is 10.3× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons