Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Reflection

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Reflection
$0.25 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.013 / $0.0168
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Reflection
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 31.4× cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Beam 1.0 501B A23BGLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.25$0.013
Output price / 1M$1.00$0.0168
Blended price (3:1)$0.44$0.014
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.0119
Context window1M1M
Max output131K944K
Intelligence index—27.8
Coding index—71.5
Providers—40
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-162026-08-26
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 31.4× cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Beam 1.0 501B A23B ≈ $1,000, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $34.40.

More comparisons