Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Q

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Q
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 13.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$6.00$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.25$0.016
Context window1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index39.9
Coding index71.9
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-122026-09-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 13.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons