Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A+ is 5.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the larger context window (1M vs 192K).
| Command A+ | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.60 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 192K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 39.9 |
| Coding index | — | 71.9 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Command A+ is 5.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A+ vs Grok 4.7Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A+ vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A+ vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed