Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 2.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 39.9). Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M$4.00$2.00
Output price / 1M$20.00$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index57.639.9
Coding index71.9
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-08-12
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 2.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons