GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 25% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Sol scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (47.5 vs 39.9). GPT-6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 47.5 | 39.9 |
| Coding index | — | 71.9 |
| Providers | 7 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 25% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6 Sol: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Sol ≈ $9,000, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
GPT-6 Sol vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Command A+GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.7GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-6 Sol vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed