Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Arcee Ai

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Arcee Ai
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 41% cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.6 vs 10.8). Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLTrinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.47$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.06
Context window1M262K
Max output944K80K
Intelligence index13.610.8
Coding index—25.8
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152026-04-01
Retirement—2026-10-26

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Trinity Large Thinking?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 41% cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons