Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.80 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 3.7× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.47$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.40
Context window1M128K
Max output944K115K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-152025-02-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 3.7× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons