Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral AI
$0.35 / $0.56
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.0× cheaper than Mistral Small 3.1 24B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 128K).
Mistral Small 3.1 24BNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.35$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.56$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.40$0.20
Cached input / 1M
Context window128K131K
Max output102K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2025-03-172026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.0× cheaper than Mistral Small 3.1 24B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B: 128,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mistral Small 3.1 24B ≈ $979.50, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons