GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral AI
$0.35 / $0.56
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
M
Verdict: Mistral Small 3.1 24B is 32% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXMistral Small 3.1 24B
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.35
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.56
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.40
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M128K
Max output131K102K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182025-03-17
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B is 32% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Mistral Small 3.1 24B ≈ $979.50.

More comparisons