Command A+ vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mistral Small 3.1 24B is 33% cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A+ has the larger context window (192K vs 128K).
| Command A+ | Mistral Small 3.1 24B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.35 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.56 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.60 | $0.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | — |
| Context window | 192K | 128K |
| Max output | 64K | 102K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2025-03-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?
Mistral Small 3.1 24B is 33% cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A+ vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which has a bigger context window?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B: 128,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Mistral Small 3.1 24B ≈ $979.50.
More comparisons
Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A+ vs Grok 4.7Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A+ vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A+ vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMistral Small 3.1 24B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-6 Luna ProMistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-6 LunaMistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-6 Sol ProMistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-6 SolMistral Small 3.1 24B vs Claude Opus 5.5Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed