Saba vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Saba is 10.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
| Saba | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.20 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.30 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.02 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 33K | 1M |
| Max output | 26K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 45.4 |
| Coding index | — | 76.2 |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-02-17 | 2026-09-03 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Saba or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
Saba is 10.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Saba vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Saba ≈ $700.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
Saba vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSaba vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSaba vs Command A+Saba vs GPT-6 Luna ProSaba vs GPT-6 LunaSaba vs GPT-6 Sol ProSaba vs GPT-6 SolSaba vs Claude Opus 5.5Saba vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedSaba vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSaba vs Grok 4.7Saba vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSaba vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSaba vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSaba vs GPT-6 AstraSaba vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 5.5