MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.40 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 5.0× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.1 vs 13.4). MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.40
Output price / 1M$0.60$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$1.30
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M131K
Max output524K33K
Intelligence index29.113.4
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192025-09-23
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 5.0× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ≈ $2,800.

More comparisons