MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Xiaomi

$0.43 / $0.87

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)

$2.00 / $6.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.3 vs 39.9).

	MiMo-V2.6-Pro	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M	$0.43	$2.00
Output price / 1M	$0.87	$6.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.54	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	$0.0036	$0.25
Context window	1M	1M
Max output	131K	131K
Intelligence index	46.3	39.9
Coding index	—	71.9
Providers	—	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2026-08-12
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Pro ≈ $1,305, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Cost calculator

FAQ

More comparisons