MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Xiaomi
$0.43 / $0.87
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 2.4× cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
MiMo-V2.5-ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$0.43$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.87$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.54$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.0036$0.016
Context window1.1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index26
Coding index60.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-04-222026-09-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 2.4× cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.5-Pro ≈ $1,305, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons