MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Xiaomi
$0.43 / $0.87
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Xiaomi
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 5.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (45.4 vs 26). MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
MiMo-V2.5-ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.43$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.87$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.54$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.0036$0.25
Context window1.1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index2645.4
Coding index60.276.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-04-222026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 5.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.5-Pro ≈ $1,305, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons