MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.1× cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.43 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.87 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.54 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0036 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 26 | — |
| Coding index | 60.2 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.1× cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 1,050,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.5-Pro ≈ $1,305, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Command A+MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5