DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek

$0.14 / $0.42

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Xiaomi

$0.43 / $0.87

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 2.6× cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.5 vs 26). MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.43
Output price / 1M	$0.42	$0.87
Blended price (3:1)	$0.21	$0.54
Cached input / 1M	$0.0042	$0.0036
Context window	1M	1.1M
Max output	131K	131K
Intelligence index	39.5	26
Coding index	—	60.2
Providers	26	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-10	2026-04-22
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 2.6× cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ≈ $1,305.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro