Mercury 2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.1× cheaper than Mercury 2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
| Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.25 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.75 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.38 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.025 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 50K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 31.1 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.2% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-03-04 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.1× cheaper than Mercury 2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Mercury 2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Mercury 2: 128,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mercury 2 ≈ $875.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Mercury 2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMercury 2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMercury 2 vs Command A+Mercury 2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMercury 2 vs GPT-6 LunaMercury 2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMercury 2 vs GPT-6 SolMercury 2 vs Claude Opus 5.5Mercury 2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMercury 2 vs Grok 4.7Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMercury 2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMercury 2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMercury 2 vs GPT-6 AstraMercury 2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProMercury 2 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5