Mercury 2 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 30% cheaper than Mercury 2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
| Mercury 2 | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.25 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.75 | $0.60 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.38 | $0.26 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.025 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 50K | 524K |
| Intelligence index | — | 29.1 |
| Coding index | 31.1 | — |
| Providers | — | 11 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-03-04 | 2026-10-19 |
| Retirement | 2026-11-08 | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 30% cheaper than Mercury 2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Mercury 2 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Mercury 2: 128,000 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mercury 2 ≈ $875.00, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.
More comparisons
Mercury 2 vs Gemini 4 CarbonMercury 2 vs Claude Fable 5.2Mercury 2 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMercury 2 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMercury 2 vs Hy4Mercury 2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMercury 2 vs GPT-6.1 TerraMercury 2 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMercury 2 vs Kimi K3.1 ProMercury 2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLMercury 2 vs Gemini 4 ArgonMercury 2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Mercury 2 vs Nano Banana 2.1Mercury 2 vs Mistral Large 4Mercury 2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Hy4MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro