DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Mercury 2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Inception

Mercury 2

Inception
$0.25 / $0.75
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Inception
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.6× cheaper than Mercury 2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 2
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.75
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.38
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.025
Context window1M128K
Max output393K50K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—31.1
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-03-04
Retirement—2026-11-08

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Mercury 2?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.6× cheaper than Mercury 2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Mercury 2: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Mercury 2: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Mercury 2 ≈ $875.00.

More comparisons