LongCat 2.0 vs Nemotron 3 Super
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3 Super is 3.0× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. LongCat 2.0 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (19.1 vs 12.8). LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| LongCat 2.0 | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.08 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.20 | $0.45 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.52 | $0.17 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.006 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 19.1 | 12.8 |
| Coding index | 45.3 | 37.7 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-20 | 2026-03-11 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, LongCat 2.0 or Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is 3.0× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
LongCat 2.0 vs Nemotron 3 Super: which has a bigger context window?
LongCat 2.0: 1,048,756 tokens. Nemotron 3 Super: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: LongCat 2.0 ≈ $1,200, Nemotron 3 Super ≈ $385.00.
More comparisons
LongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLongCat 2.0 vs Command A+LongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 LunaLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 SolLongCat 2.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5LongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLongCat 2.0 vs Grok 4.7LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLongCat 2.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 AstraLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3 Super vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3 Super vs Command A+Nemotron 3 Super vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3 Super vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3 Super vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3 Super vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3 Super vs Claude Opus 5.5