Llama Guard 4 12B vs Relace Search
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 8.3× cheaper than Relace Search on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Relace Search has the larger context window (256K vs 164K).
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Relace Search | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.18 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.18 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $1.50 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 164K | 256K |
| Max output | 16K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2025-12-08 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Relace Search?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 8.3× cheaper than Relace Search on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Relace Search: which has a bigger context window?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Relace Search: 256,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Relace Search ≈ $3,500.
More comparisons
Llama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLlama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Grok 4.7Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 AstraLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Astra ProRelace Search vs GLM 5.3 PrimeRelace Search vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeRelace Search vs Command A+Relace Search vs GPT-6 Luna ProRelace Search vs GPT-6 LunaRelace Search vs GPT-6 Sol ProRelace Search vs GPT-6 SolRelace Search vs Claude Opus 5.5