Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 4.2× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
Llama Guard 4 12BQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.18$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.75
Cached input / 1M
Context window164K262K
Max output16K33K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302025-10-06
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 4.2× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons